GoLife.greenSign in
Product Checker Comparison

Which product checker helps you reduce exposure over time?

GoLife compares ingredients, packaging, usage context, and frequency — so you can see which small choices may matter most in real life.

The GoLife difference: we weigh ingredients alongside packaging, the product's real-world usage context (skin contact, heat, rinse-off, inhalation), and how often you actually use it.

FeatureGoLifeYukaEWG
Primary focusExposure tracking + product checksBarcode health ratingsIngredient hazard research
Scoring styleConcern + usage context + frequency0–100 product score1–10 hazard/data score
Ingredient analysisYesYesYes
Packaging / material contextYesLimited / not coreLimited / not core
Microplastic-related flagsYes, when identifiableNot clearly positioned for thisPartial / ingredient-level research
EU / Prop 65 / IARC referencesYesSome source referencesSome regulatory / toxicity references
Tracks exposure over timeYesScan history, not exposure trendsNo personal dashboard
Personalized by usage frequencyYesNoNo
Free access5 free product checksFree barcode scanning; premium adds search, offline mode, preferences, and extended historyFree web database and Healthy Living app

GoLife.green

GoLife.green takes a regulatory-first approach and adds something most checkers skip: context. We check ingredients against documented regulatory findings — substances banned or restricted by the European Union, listed under California Prop 65, and classified by IARC — and then weigh the result against how often you use the product and how it's actually used.

GoLife does not just ask what is in the product. It also asks how the product is used, how often it is used, and whether it creates a realistic opportunity to reduce exposure.

Adjusts the priority of every finding based on your real frequency of use — a daily lotion is treated very differently from an annual polish.
Considers how the product is used: heated, inhaled, left on skin, rinsed off, eaten — so the advice matches real exposure.
Every flag comes with a source link — no black-box scoring.
Flags potential microplastic-related ingredients, materials, and packaging contexts.
Tracks your cumulative exposure week by week so you can measure real progress.
5 free product checks with no credit card required — see value before paying.
Smaller product database than Yuka (growing fast via community scans).
Newer app — some niche categories still being expanded.

Best for

People who want transparency, regulatory-backed facts, and the ability to track their exposure to flagged substances over time.

Yuka

Yuka publishes a high-level scoring methodology and provides product explanations, but it is primarily a product rating tool, not a personalized exposure tracker. It assigns a 0–100 score to food and cosmetic products based on a documented framework.

Massive product database — scan barcodes for instant results.
Very fast scan-to-result experience.
Popular for cosmetics and food products.
Same score for everyone — does not factor in how often or how you use the product.
No exposure tracking over time — each scan is isolated.
Premium adds features like search, offline mode, preferences, and extended history.

Best for

Quick barcode scans of mainstream food and beauty products where speed matters most.

EWG (Environmental Working Group)

EWG is a nonprofit research and advocacy organization. EWG offers web databases and the Healthy Living app, but it is not centered on tracking a person's exposure profile over time. Their Skin Deep database rates cosmetics ingredients on a 1–10 hazard scale, and their Food Scores database covers processed foods.

Deep research on individual ingredients with hazard classifications.
Free web database and Healthy Living app.
Covers a wide range of chemical categories.
No personalization — hazard scores don't account for your frequency of use or how the product is used.
No exposure tracking or personal dashboard.
Database relies on manufacturer-reported data, which can be incomplete.

Best for

Researchers and engaged consumers who want to look up individual ingredients in depth.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GoLife better than Yuka?

It depends on the job. Yuka is useful for fast barcode ratings. GoLife is built for people who want to understand ingredients, packaging, usage context, and frequency — then track progress over time.

Does GoLife detect microplastics?

GoLife flags potential microplastic-related ingredients, materials, and packaging contexts when they can be identified from a label, product description, or packaging information. It does not perform lab testing.

Why does frequency of use matter in a product analysis?

A substance you're exposed to daily contributes far more to your cumulative exposure than the same substance in a product you use twice a year. GoLife recalibrates priority based on your actual frequency, so the things at the top of your list are the ones that would genuinely move the needle for you.

What do you mean by 'how the product is used'?

The same ingredient behaves very differently depending on use. A plastic container heated in a microwave releases more than one sitting cold in a pantry. A leave-on lotion has more skin contact than a rinse-off cleanser. A spray is inhaled; a wipe is not. GoLife reads that context and adjusts the advice accordingly.

Can I use these apps for free?

GoLife.green gives you 5 free product checks with no credit card required. Yuka offers free barcode scanning, with premium adding search, offline mode, preferences, and extended history. EWG offers a free web database and Healthy Living app.

See the difference for yourself

Try GoLife.green with 5 free product checks — no credit card required.

Get 5 free product checksHow it works